Project Brief

Assessment Intelligence

A mathematics assessment becomes useful when a department can connect its results to a decision. This demonstration pairs the Logos assessment and department report with an interactive dashboard of the same data, figures, and teaching priorities.

Open Dashboard Read Department Report Take the Assessment GitHub Repo

Overview

One assessment, three connected experiences

The 30-question form defines what is assessed. The dashboard exposes patterns across 500 fictional students and 21 classes. The report explains the evidence and proposes follow-up decisions for the department.

The same three findings guide both presentations: geometric readiness in Algebra II, uncertain differences between tracks, and variation among Regular Geometry classes.

Inspect First

  • Filterable course, class, content-area, and question results
  • Six original figures from the Logos department report
  • Planned comparisons with their original uncertainty and Holm adjustments
  • The paired practice assessment and question booklet
  • Reproducible publication checks and downloadable aggregate values
Dashboard Department report Validation summary Gradebook synthesis Source repo

System Story

From reporting need to reviewable decision

01

Problem

Department averages can conceal readiness gaps and class variation. Educators need to inspect the same questions and understand what a comparison can support.

02

Approach

A checked import brings reviewed synthetic aggregates, report interpretation, and six unchanged figures into the portfolio. Browser filters expose selected groups without recalculating the report's statistical tests.

03

Result

Users can trace a department finding to a course, class, or question, download the displayed values, and inspect the corresponding assessment and written interpretation.

04

Lesson

One administration can guide follow-up questions. It cannot establish growth, instructional effects, or a defensible placement cutoff.

Explore the work

Assessment, analysis, and reporting

Stakeholder dashboard

Explore the report's synthetic aggregates by course and track, inspect class and question results, and retain the full-department figures alongside filtered values.

Open dashboard

Department report

The written report connects statistical evidence to proposed teaching checks, responsible teams, and review points.

Read department report

Practice assessment

Take the same 30-question form and inspect its browser-based feedback. Personal practice answers do not enter the fictional department data.

Open assessment
Earlier warehouse implementation and source lineage

The report-aligned dashboard is implemented in the portfolio repository and imports the reviewed Logos reporting bundle. It does not claim that the Logos data passed through the earlier dbt pipeline.

The separate longitudinal demo, R report, and public Assessment Intelligence repository retain the earlier SQL/dbt/DuckDB workflow and its original data. They are separate demonstrations.

Projects Qualification / August 2026 warehouse snapshot

Strongest education-data architecture candidate once the dbt check is relocatable. Static artifacts are reviewable now, but a live interview rebuild and public feature must use the repaired, release-synchronized commit.

Safety Boundary

Synthetic by design

Public artifacts must not include real student names, emails, IDs, grades, rosters, LMS exports, submissions, or private school reporting artifacts. Canvas is treated as one possible adapter, not the project identity.